Music/Sound Related Libraries/Components

Just that I will remember these:

  • Alexandria Media Library is a loosely coupled suite of media applications written in C#. The architectue of Alexandria allows plugins to be designed to perform any function imaginable and then integrate these with the existing plugins to provide a full application. Plugins exist for: media playback, playlists, tagging with metadata, search for media and metadata, etc.
  • FMOD with FMOD Ex Programming API is a revolutionary multiplatform new audio engine featuring e.g. fantastic sounding DSP audio engine, choice of low-level or data-driven API, built-in DSP effect suite and VST support, as well as advanced features such as 2D/3D morphing, 3D reverb support and geometric occlusion, etc.
  • MusicDNS by MusicIP provides a method for acoustically identifying digital music and acquiring the correct metadata. MusicDNS consistently identifies the same digital music recording, regardless language or audio file format. Track level fingerprints are finely tuned for accurate matching, and eliminate the cost and challenges of legacy CD data. The database is kept current as new albums are released. Sounds cool!
  • MusicBrainz is a community music metadatabase that attempts to create a comprehensive music information site. You can use the MusicBrainz data either by browsing this web site, or you can access the data from a client program — for example, a CD player program can use MusicBrainz to identify CDs and provide information about the CD, about the artist or about related information. You can also use the MusicBrainz Tagger to automatically identify and clean up the metadata tags in your digital music collections.

Google Code University

Google Code University provides tutorials and sample course content, so computer science students (and not only, I would add!) can learn more about current computing technologies and paradigms, e.g. AJAX programming, algorithms, distributed systems, web security, languages. In the Tools 101 section you will find a set of introductions to some common tools used in Computer Science such as version control systems and databases.

Today’s Blogs

  • The Old New Thing by Raymond Chen – really nice blog with a lot of in-depth info, e.g. wonderful posts about The implementation of iterators in C# and its consequences (part 1, part 2, part 3), The implementation of anonymous methods in C# and its consequences (part 1, part 2, part 3), a lot of native Win32 topics (e.g. DLLs, processes, controls, etc.), etc. Probably there is no aspect of Windows that would not be covered at that blog! :)
  • jaredpar’s WebLog by Jared Parsons – blog of the author of RantPack – a library that features functional programming patterns (tuples, immutable/persistent collections), threading utils (futures, cancelable futures, active objects, various other primitives), etc. The blog is very interesting, and there are many insights into software development topics

Marshaling between Managed and Unmanaged Code

I have blogged about it already earlier, but now, when I needed it, I could not find it easily, so I decided to do a bit of “rehashing”…

MSDN Magazine Marshaling between Managed and Unmanaged Code article goes into deep details about marshalling and not only. The cool part: the article has a reference to the P/Invoke Interop Assistant GUI Tool that is handy for doing simple conversions. The tool is now available here, at the CodePlex.

The tool has three tabs: SigExp, SigImp Search, and SigImp Translate Snippet:

  • SigExp converts managed signature to an unmanaged signature. It reflects over managed assemblies to find all P/Invoke declarations and COM imported types, and produces the corresponding native C signatures.
  • SigImp Search and SigImp Translate Snippet convert unmanaged signatures to managed signatures. SigImp Search allows users to select a native type, procedure, or constant to perform the converstion from – it will display a list of supported types, methods, and constants collected from Windows SDK header files. SigImp Translate Snippet allows users to write their own native code snippet in the tool and then it will generate the managed code equivalent.

The snippet translators work well for small snippets of code, but if you need to translate a larger code base, you should use the command line version of the tool – sigimp.exe (included). It is designed to process several header files and produce a mass output.

.NET Framework 3.5 Enhancements Training Kit

The .NET Framework 3.5 Enhancements Training Kit includes presentations, hands-on labs, demos, and event materials, that help learning utilization of the .NET 3.5 enhancement features including: ASP.NET MVC, ASP.NET Dynamic Data, ASP.NET AJAX History, ASP.NET Routing, ADO.NET Data Services, ADO.NET Entity Framework, WCF 3.5 SP1, and the .NET Framework Client Profile. I would wish they would cover more technologies in it though…

VS2008 SP1 and .NET 3.5 SP1 are Here!

The long awaited SP1 for .NET 3.5 and Visual Studio 2008 are finally here! ISO is available here and EXE – here. Before installing you need to run Visual Studio 2008 Service Pack Preparation Tool in case you had SP1 beta or some hotfixes installed earlier.

There are also Visual Studio 2008 Service Pack 1 Remote Debugger and Visual Studio 2008 Service Pack 1 Stand-Alone Profiler.

And, of course, here is the .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 itself, either as a bootstrapper or as a full package. Note, that you do not need these if you are installing VS2008 SP1 – .NET 3.5 SP1 is already included with it.

Today’s Links

These are mostly related to systems’ programming:

Tools for Framework Architecture Verification

Tools for Framework Architecture Verification is a suite of tools primarily aimed at validating the architecture of a framework. Currently, there are three tools:

  • Deps: produces dependency diagrams between assemblies, based both on implementation, as well as API-only.
  • Layering: verifies that a layering and grouping diagram is indeed satisfied by a set of assemblies
  • PotentialCallers: lists all the methods that call, directly or indirectly, a set of methods.

New Tools for Framework Designers Published by Brad Abrams sheds a bit more light on these tools. By the way you will need F# to run these :).

Interesting Microsoft Tools

  • Microsoft SharedView – little known Microsoft remote desktop tool. Allows to connect with up to 15 people in different locations and show them what’s on your screen. You can share, review, and update documents with multiple people in real time. Have tried it, and it really rocks – no idea why Microsoft is “hiding” it from people.
  • Windows SteadyState 2.5. Microsoft says, “Whether you manage computers in a school computer lab or an Internet cafe, a library, or even in your home, Windows SteadyState helps make it easy for you to keep your computers running the way you want them to, no matter who uses them.” SteadyState provides a more effective way to help defend shared computers from changes by untrusted users and unwanted software installations, as well as safeguard system resources. Features include: Windows Disk Protection, User Restrictions and Settings, User Account Manager, Computer Restrictions, Schedule Software Updates. I have not used this tool yet, but I guess it might be really cool in some circumstances.
  • SyncToy v2.0 – helps you copy, move, rename, and delete files between folders and computers quickly and easily. Again, have not used it myself yet, but needed such a tool million times in the past.

DirectShow Resources

There is no need to say anything about any of the following:

  • Geraint Davies Consulting Ltd or GDCL – the home of Geraint Davies, the author of DirectShow, and famous GMFBridge. The site has a lot of interesting information about DirectShow, e.g. introduction to filters, technical Q&A, as well as some pretty elaborative samples like demuxers
  • The March Hare – the guy is always present at DirectShow forums :) . Filter Graph Library, despite being written by another guy can be downloaded from this site as well
  • Alessandro Angeli’s Programming FAQ – a lot of useful DirectShow tips and tricks
  • GraphEditPlus – is GraphEdit done right :) . Especially nice time-saving feature is its graph code generation – you build the graph and GraphEditPlus generates its C++ creation code

Mocking Frameworks

Today was Sunday and I took a “day-off” from the project :) and decided to look into the world of mocking… Before I start, I should admit, that while I understand (or at least I hope so) principles and benefits of Test Driven Development (TDD) and mocking, I have never used them in my work. There are a few reasons for this:

  1. Currently I am developing a digital TV feature and infrastructure for an advanced set-top box (running on Windows XP Embedded), and simply do not get how I can use TDD and mocking with needs like processing 25-40+ megabit transport streams and doing something useful with them. The code that I would be able to test using TDD and mocking is way too simple for this, and the code I perhaps would be interested in testing automatically, is not really “testable” for the abovementioned reasons.
  2. Unit testing and mocking frameworks for C++ and C++/CLI, the two languages I use 80% of my time nowadays, are quite “anemic” at best, and it is really no fun to use anything like those frameworks.
  3. On top of that, to be honest, I never felt the need to use TDD and mocking in my own practice. Retrospectively thinking, I do not remember any project where TDD or mocking would substantially improve the quality of my code and/or reduce the number of defects (although I definitely know cases where it would not harm to use TDD and mocking) – I am not “boosting” myself, but there is an order of magnitude difference in performance among developers, and even bigger difference in quality of the code they write. In fact, I think TDD and mocks were invented to somehow compensate for this difference.
  4. I somehow have a weird feeling about adding to my project as much testing/mocking code as there is “normal” code. And then, I am definitely not “purist” but rather “pragmatic” – I agree that it might be wise to have unit testing/mocking in some parts of the system, but definitely not everywhere.

So, now that I explained my background, I am ready to continue. After spending quite much time on Google and other development-related sites I managed to narrow the list of available .NET mocking frameworks down to three: Typemock Isolator, Rhino Mocks, and Moq. All frameworks support .NET 3.5 (Rhino has it in version 3.5 RC).

Typemock is definitely the most powerful of these frameworks, but this property of Typemock is often mentioned in the cons section. The argument is, that while allowing mocking everything and everywhere, Typemock is not really helping developers to design loosely coupled code – for example, you do not have to “resort” to Inversion of Control (IoC) principle to use Typemock. I think Typemock is as its best when you try to introduce TDD and mocking into legacy project to get better understanding of that code and to have easier time modifying it. The framework has a free version, but to get e.g. its Natural Mocks feature (allowing to define expectations by recording them in a type-safe manner) you will have to cash out 349€ for Professional or 449€ for Enterprise editions.

Rhino Mocks is likely the most used .NET mocking framework. The framework looks quite powerful, is type-safe, supports generics, and is actively developed.

Then, there is Moq – a newcomer to the scene. Some people criticize it for being too simple. Some accuse it of not being “pure”. From what I have seen today, I should say that I liked it most (second being Rhino). It has rather elegant type-safe API built around lambda expressions. This API allows writing shorter and more concise code than Rhino does. What sets Moq apart from other mocking frameworks is that it is not using the record/playback model.

I will definitely give TDD and mocking a try on my next project. On the other hand, my C++ part of our current project is much smaller than our C#/.NET 3.5/WPF code-base, so I might introduce mocking into our current project if there will be not too big “opposition” from the development team and other project stakeholders – we are under heavy time pressure now, and adding some new concepts at this moment will probably introduce significant delays. I think that the framework of choice will be Moq, although it is just a gut-feeling at this moment.

And here is the list of interesting blogs/sites about the mocking:

Duck Typing Project

Recently I has been looking at various mocking frameworks, and found Duck Typing Project (by David Meyer AKA “deft flux”) – a .NET class library written in C# that enables duck typing for any .NET language. Current release is a bit oldish, but David promised to finalize version 1.0 and start working on 2.0, which will include a name change to something along the lines of “dynamic typing” instead of “duck typing” to reflect the implementation of more dynamic typing concepts than just duck typing, as well as add some .NET 3.5 features like extension methods.

How Duck Typing Benefits C# Developers by Phil Haack provides quick into to duck typing and its benefits.